Still from The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 (2014)
Ranked · by Priya Nair

Hunger Games Movies Ranked: Best to Worst

Hunger Games movies ranked, best to worst, in my opinion: The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013) is first, then The Hunger Games (2012), The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 2, The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes and, in last place, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1. The list covers the four main films and the prequel spin-off, and The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping stays unranked until it opens on November 20, 2026.

Image: TMDB

Key Takeaways

  • The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013) is the best Hunger Games movie in this ranking, and it is also the highest grossing of the five at $870 million worldwide.
  • The Hunger Games (2012) made the best return on its cost: $695 million worldwide on a $78 million budget.
  • The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes is the longest film in the series at 157 minutes and the lowest grossing at $364 million worldwide.
  • The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 1 ranks last here because of its structure, not its performance, since it earned $762 million worldwide.
  • The Hunger Games: Sunrise on the Reaping opens on November 20, 2026 and stays unranked until it is released.

Hot Takes

  • Catching Fire beats the original because the first film had to explain Panem, while the second film got to argue about it. Priya Nair, opinion.
  • Mockingjay Part 1 earned more than Part 2 and still deserves last place, because a setup film should not need its sequel to justify it. Priya Nair, opinion.
  • The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes has the most interesting premise in the saga and the least balanced running time. Priya Nair, opinion.

Opinion, by Priya Nair.

  1. 1The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013) theatrical poster

    The Hunger Games: Catching Fire

    Catching Fire turns the story political, with Snow's warning, the Victory Tour and Gale's public whipping raising the stakes before any arena. It added Finnick, Johanna, Beetee and Plutarch to the ensemble. In my opinion it is the best balanced film in the series, and it is also the highest grossing.

  2. 2The Hunger Games (2012) theatrical poster

    The Hunger Games

    The original is the cleanest introduction, from Katniss volunteering for Primrose to Haymitch's coaching in the Capitol. It returned roughly nine times its $78 million budget. It ranks second only because the sequel has more to argue about.

  3. 3The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2 (2015) theatrical poster

    The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 2

    The hand picked unit of Katniss, Gale, Finnick and Peeta gives the film a tense, small scale core. Berlin locations, including twelve days at Tempelhof, give Panem a distinct look. It earned the least of the main films, which holds it below the first two.

  4. 4The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes (2023) theatrical poster

    The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes

    The prequel has the series' most interesting premise, a young Snow mentoring Lucy Gray Baird in the 10th Games. At 157 minutes it is also the longest film, and it follows a lead whose destination is already known. It is the lowest grossing film at $364 million worldwide.

  5. 5The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 (2014) theatrical poster

    The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1

    At 123 minutes it is the shortest film and the one most built around waiting, from District 13 to Katniss agreeing to be the Mockingjay. It performed strongly, with $762 million worldwide. It ranks last because, in my opinion, it feels like half a story.

Hunger Games Movies Ranked Best to Worst: How I Judged Them

In my opinion the five Hunger Games films rank, best to worst, as Catching Fire, The Hunger Games (2012), Mockingjay Part 2, The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes and Mockingjay Part 1, judged on how well each works as a story, how well it stands on its own, and how much it adds to the saga, with box office kept as context rather than a score. Aggregate scores average the opinions of many viewers, whereas this list is one opinion (mine), with reasons you are free to dispute. Fuller verdicts on each film belong on hunger games reviews.

RankFilmYearDirectorRuntime
1The Hunger Games: Catching Fire2013Francis Lawrence146 minutes
2The Hunger Games2012Gary Ross142 minutes
3The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 22015Francis Lawrence137 minutes
4The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes2023Francis Lawrence157 minutes
5The Hunger Games: Mockingjay Part 12014Francis Lawrence123 minutes

Why is the prequel in a list of the main films? The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes is a spin-off, but it shares a director with three of the main films and the same world, so it belongs in the same argument. It also comes first in story order, which you can follow in hunger games movies in order, and the wider picture sits on the hunger games movies hub.

What is the best Hunger Games movie? In my opinion it is catching fire (2013), directed by Francis Lawrence, and it is where the series found its argument. Katniss and Peeta have won and gone home, yet President Snow visits Katniss to warn her that her defiance has stirred unrest in the districts. He then sends both of them on a Victory Tour as a devoted couple, and when Gale is publicly whipped the cost becomes concrete. The pressure builds through politics first, which is a braver choice than another round of survival. It also added Sam Claflin as Finnick Odair, Jena Malone as Johanna Mason, Jeffrey Wright and Philip Seymour Hoffman to the ensemble. Its $870 million worldwide is the series high, and 146 minutes never felt long to me.

The second place goes to the hunger games 2012, directed by Gary Ross, which remains the cleanest introduction. Katniss Everdeen volunteers for her sister Primrose at the reaping, the baker's son Peeta is chosen as the male tribute, and their drunken mentor Haymitch coaches them in the Capitol. On a $78 million budget it earned $695 million worldwide, roughly nine times its cost and the best return in the series. It loses to Catching Fire only because the later film has more to say once the world is established.

Mockingjay Part 2 (2015), directed by Francis Lawrence, takes third. Katniss is recovering after Peeta, still conditioned by the Capitol, attacked her, and she joins the push on District 2. The hand picked unit around her, with Gale, Finnick and Peeta, is ordered to stay clear of the fighting and to take a suicide pill if captured, and that gives the film a tense, small scale core. Berlin supplied locations, including twelve days at Tempelhof. It earned the least of the four main films, $684 million on a $160 million budget, which perhaps reflects how much was asked of audiences after a quieter Part 1.

Fourth is the ballad of songbirds and snakes (2023), directed by Francis Lawrence. It is set about ten years after the First Rebellion and more than sixty years before the original Games. Coriolanus Snow, played by Tom Blyth, is a student from a once wealthy Capitol family on hard times, and he mentors Lucy Gray Baird, the District 12 tribute played by Rachel Zegler, in the 10th Hunger Games. Peter Dinklage and Viola Davis fill out the cast, and a new version of The Hanging Tree appeared in the trailer.

Why did the Ballad divide opinion? The complaints I find fairest are its length (157 minutes, the longest of the five) and its shape, because it follows a lead whose destination the audience already knows. That makes it hard to root for him, and it makes the film feel stretched. It also grossed $364 million worldwide on a $100 million budget, the lowest total in the series. The ambition is real, and I would still watch it again for the premise.

Last is mockingjay part 1 (2014), directed by Francis Lawrence. At 123 minutes it is the shortest film, and it is built around waiting: Katniss is taken to District 13, President Coin and Plutarch Heavensbee want her as the public face of the uprising, and she agrees on her own terms only after seeing Peeta in Capitol broadcasts. The two Mockingjay films were shot back to back at a reported $250 million, and Part 1 had the year's best opening, according to TheWrap. It grossed $762 million worldwide and gave the series The Hanging Tree, so its last place reflects structure rather than failure. It is the film that feels most like half a story.

What is the most watched Hunger Games movie? Streaming viewing figures have not been published for the series, so box office is the usable measure, and Catching Fire leads with $870 million worldwide and $425 million domestic. The full breakdown is on hunger games box office.

Where does the newest film fit? Sunrise on the Reaping is unranked because it opens on November 20, 2026 in the US and UK, directed by Francis Lawrence, in theaters and IMAX according to TheWrap quoting Lionsgate. No Australian date has been reported. You can watch the sunrise on the reaping trailer now, and I will place the film once it is out.

If you have time for one film, watch Catching Fire. If you are starting cold, follow the hunger games timeline or the release order, and check where to watch hunger games for the service that carries each film in your country.

FAQs

What is considered the best Hunger Games movie?

In my ranking the best Hunger Games movie is The Hunger Games: Catching Fire (2013), directed by Francis Lawrence. It builds pressure through President Snow's threats and the Victory Tour before any fighting, and it is also the highest grossing film in the series at $870 million worldwide. The original film, The Hunger Games (2012), is a close second.

Why did the ballad of Songbirds and Snakes get bad reviews?

The complaints I find fairest are its 157 minute running time, the longest in the series, and its decision to follow a young Coriolanus Snow, whose later path the audience already knows. It grossed $364 million worldwide on a $100 million budget, the lowest total of the five films, and I rank it fourth.

Which Hunger Games movie is the least popular?

By box office, The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds and Snakes is the least popular, with $364 million worldwide against about $684 million to $870 million for the main films. Among the main four, Mockingjay Part 2 earned the least at $684 million on a $160 million budget. In my own order, Mockingjay Part 1 comes last for its structure.

What is the most watched Hunger Games movie?

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire is the most watched by ticket sales, with $870 million worldwide and $425 million in the US and Canada, according to Box Office Mojo. The original film is next with $695 million worldwide. Streaming viewing figures for the series have not been published.

Which Hunger Games movie has the best rating?

Ratings differ from site to site and shift over time, so no single figure settles it. In my own ranking the best film is Catching Fire, and the original Hunger Games (2012) is second.

Did Jennifer Lawrence like being Katniss?

How she felt about the role is for her to say. Jennifer Lawrence is billed first as Katniss Everdeen in all four main films, and she also performed The Hanging Tree in Mockingjay Part 1 and Deep in the Meadow in Mockingjay Part 2.