Still from Saw III (2006)
Ranked · by Callan Brooks

Saw Movies Ranked: Best to Worst, All 10 Films

Saw movies ranked from best to worst, in my opinion, put Saw (2004), directed by James Wan, in first place, with Saw X second, Saw II third and Saw V last of the ten. The list covers the nine main films plus Spiral: From the Book of Saw (2021), a spinoff, and it ranks on story, trap design and cast rather than on gore.

Image: TMDB

Key Takeaways

  • In my ranking, Saw (2004) is the best Saw movie and Saw V is the weakest of the ten films.
  • Saw III earned the most of any film in the series, about $165 million worldwide, and Spiral earned the least, about $41 million.
  • Saw X, released in 2023, is set between Saw (2004) and Saw II, and it ranks second because it gives John Kramer a personal story.
  • All ten films are rated R in the US, so gore alone does not separate the strong entries from the weak ones.

Hot Takes

  • Opinion, Callan Brooks: Saw X is a better film than Saw II, and I am happy to say it out loud even though Saw II is the series favorite for many fans.
  • Opinion, Callan Brooks: Saw III is the cruelest film in the series but not the scariest, because the dread of the first film comes from what you cannot see, and Saw III shows you almost everything.
  • Opinion, Callan Brooks: Spiral deserves a place above Saw V, because it at least tries to change the formula while Saw V mostly repeats it.

Opinion, by Callan Brooks.

  1. 1Saw (2004) theatrical poster

    Saw

    Two strangers, one bathroom and a 6:00 deadline make the tightest setup in the series, and the film never needs a second location to keep the pressure on. In my opinion, nothing later matches how little it spends to unsettle you. It also set the money pattern, turning a $1.2 million budget into about $104 million worldwide.

  2. 2Saw X (2023) theatrical poster

    Saw X

    It lets John Kramer be the one deceived, which gives the saga its best reason to care about him since the first film. Tobin Bell and Shawnee Smith are not de-aged, and the Mexico City clinic traps lean on practical prosthetics. At 118 minutes it is the longest film in the series, and it earns most of that length.

  3. 3Saw II (2005) theatrical poster

    Saw II

    Darren Lynn Bousman trades one room for a house filling with nerve gas and a sit down talk between John Kramer and Eric Matthews, which is where Tobin Bell first leads the billing. Eric and his son Daniel give the traps personal stakes. It runs 93 minutes and wastes few of them.

  4. 4Saw III (2006) theatrical poster

    Saw III

    The most punishing film in the series, with Troy tearing chains out of his own body and Kerry hooked into a rib harness. It could be argued that the traps outrun the characters. It also earned the most of any film, about $165 million worldwide.

  5. 5Saw VI (2009) theatrical poster

    Saw VI

    The sharpest premise after the original: two predatory lenders in the opener and an insurance executive judged on denying coverage. Kevin Greutert directs with a clear idea of what each trap should say. It was the weakest earner of the main films, which I would not read as a verdict on the film.

  6. 6Jigsaw (2017) theatrical poster

    Jigsaw

    The Spierig brothers give the series a cleaner look and a good hook: the barn, the buckets and a recorded voice from a man dead for ten years. It is a neat reset that earned about $103 million on a $10 million budget. The Spierigs did not write the script, and in my opinion the film feels more like a handsome reboot than a story of its own.

  7. 7Spiral: From the Book of Saw (2021) theatrical poster

    Spiral: From the Book of Saw

    Chris Rock and Samuel L. Jackson bring a different energy, and the pig mask opener ending in a subway tunnel is a bold swerve. The police procedural frame leaves less room for the traps to say anything about their victims. It earned about $41 million on a $20 million budget, the lowest of the ten.

  8. 8Saw IV (2007) theatrical poster

    Saw IV

    It starts with the boldest idea in the series, an autopsy that finds a tape recorder inside Jigsaw's body, then spends much of its time catching up to its own plot. Perhaps the tests Rigg faces feel the least personal of any film. At 93 minutes it moves, but a first time viewer has to do homework.

  9. 9Saw 3D (2010) theatrical poster

    Saw 3D

    Cary Elwes returning as Dr. Gordon pays off a promise from the first film, and Bobby Dagen, the self help author who lied about surviving a trap, is a good target. The public setting trap and the 3D cameras lean on spectacle that plays flatter at home. It earned about $134 million on a $17 million budget.

  10. 10Saw V (2008) theatrical poster

    Saw V

    Hoffman being hailed as a hero while Agent Strahm digs, and five strangers passing tests, do not feel like they belong to the same film. In my opinion, the tests look cut from a smaller movie. Even so, it earned about $114 million on a $10.8 million budget.

How I Ranked the Saw Movies Best to WorstSpoilers

I ranked the Saw movies on how well each film builds its central trap scenario, how it uses the Jigsaw mythology, and how it treats its cast, then adjusted for how the film sits beside its neighbors. Gore is not the measure. Every film is rated R in the US, so the violence is closer to a constant than a variable, and what separates a strong entry from a weak one is whether the traps carry a story. Box office is a cross check and never the verdict, and I use no critic or audience scores. If you want the viewing sequence rather than my opinion, start with saw movies in order.

The field is ten films: nine main entries from Saw (2004) to Saw X, plus Spiral: From the Book of Saw (2021) as a spinoff. Saw X was released in 2023 but is set between the first two films, so its rank has nothing to do with chronology. The saw timeline explained page covers where each story sits, and the full list of saw movies is on the hub. Light spoilers follow for the setup of each film, with the big twists left alone.

Why Does Saw (2004) Still Come First?

Saw 2004, directed by James Wan, is first because it needs only a filthy bathroom, two chained men and a dead body holding a revolver and a microcassette recorder. Dr. Lawrence Gordon is told to kill Adam by 6:00 or his wife and daughter die, and hacksaws in the toilet cistern hint at the price of getting free. It began as a short film and was shot in 18 days around a Lacy Street location with handheld cameras, according to Wikipedia read alongside the trade coverage. Lions Gate bought worldwide rights before the Sundance midnight screening, per Screen Daily, and the $1.2 million production returned about $104 million worldwide.

Tobin Bell is billed third as Jigsaw, behind Leigh Whannell as Adam and Cary Elwes as Dr. Gordon, and TheWrap reports he spent six days lying on that bathroom floor. In my opinion, no later film spends so little to unsettle you so much.

What Puts Saw X and Saw II Next?

Saw X, directed by Kevin Greutert, takes second place because it gives John Kramer a human motive. He learns he has terminal brain cancer, meets a man at a support group who says an experimental treatment in Norway cured him, and travels to a clinic outside Mexico City run by Cecilia, only to find the clinic empty and the treatment a scam. The production decided not to de-age Bell or Shawnee Smith, the traps use practical prosthetics from Fractured FX, and Nick Matthews shot much of it handheld with visible grain. At 118 minutes it is the longest film in the series, and it earned about $125 million worldwide on a $13 million budget.

Saw 2, directed by Darren Lynn Bousman, is third for a different reason: it swaps one room for a house filling with nerve gas, with eight people inside, including Detective Eric Matthews's teenage son Daniel. John Kramer is arrested at a factory and tells Eric to sit and talk with him, which turns the film into a face to face standoff as much as a trap. Box Office Mojo lists a $4 million budget (The Numbers lists $5 million) against about $148 million worldwide, and Toronto's Cinespace supplied the sets.

Where Do Saw III, Saw VI and Jigsaw Land?

Saw 3 lands fourth because it is the hardest to watch and the most successful, with about $165 million worldwide on a $10 million budget. A man named Troy must tear chains out of his own body to escape a bomb, and Detective Kerry is locked into a harness hooked into her ribs, which is the series at its most punishing. It could be argued that the traps outrun the characters here, and a soundtrack of Slayer, Lamb of God and Helmet tracks (covered in the saw soundtrack guide) gives it a harder edge than its predecessors.

Saw 6 is fifth and has the sharpest idea of the middle sequels. Two predatory lenders, Eddie and Simone, open the film in a trap where one must pay with their own body, and insurance executive William Easton is then tested on his company's habit of denying coverage. Kevin Greutert directs, and the film earned about $68 million on an $11 million budget, the lowest of the main films, which I would not read as a verdict on its quality.

Jigsaw 2017, directed by Michael and Peter Spierig, is sixth. Five strangers wake in a barn with buckets on their heads and chains around their necks, and a recording in the voice of a man dead for ten years sets the rules. The Spierigs did not write the script, and the film is set ten years after Saw: The Final Chapter. It earned about $103 million on a $10 million budget.

Why Do Spiral, Saw IV, Saw 3D and Saw V Sit at the Bottom?

Spiral Saw is seventh and the series' most unusual film. Chris Rock plays Detective Zeke Banks and Samuel L. Jackson plays Marcus Banks in a police procedural that opens with an off duty detective attacked by a figure in a pig mask and killed by a subway train. It earned about $41 million on a $20 million budget, the lowest gross of the ten.

Saw 4 is eighth. It opens with an autopsy that finds a tape recorder inside Jigsaw's body, a bold start, but it was the first Saw film not written by Leigh Whannell or James Wan, and it asks a first time viewer to do a lot of homework. Fox News reported an estimated $32.1 million opening weekend, just under Saw III's $33.6 million debut.

Saw 3D is ninth. Cary Elwes returns as Dr. Gordon, which pays off a promise from the first film, and the self help author Bobby Dagen is a fine target for a trap, but the public setting set piece and the 3D cameras lean on spectacle that plays flatter at home. Saw 5, directed by David Hackl, is last, in my opinion, because it splits its time between Mark Hoffman being hailed as a hero while Agent Strahm digs into his past, and five strangers passing tests that feel cut from a smaller film. The profile of mark hoffman saw shows why he carries the middle of the saga.

Can You Rank the Saw Movies by Gore?

Not reliably, because every film is rated R in the US and 18 in the UK, so the ratings do not separate them. Australia is the one market where the ratings differ: Saw V, Saw 3D and Spiral are rated R 18+, while the other seven are MA 15+. If I had to name the films where the traps are most direct about the body, I would point to Saw III, the opener of Saw VI and the Mexico City clinic scenes in Saw X, but that is opinion, and the saw traps guide describes them without the detail.

Which Saw Movies Should You Watch First?

Start with Saw (2004), Saw X and Saw II if you only have time for three, then move to Saw III. Check where to watch saw for what is streaming in your country, and see saw box office for the money behind each film. If a sequel is next on your list, the status of saw 11 is tracked separately.

FAQs

Which Saw movie is considered the best?

In my ranking, Saw (2004), directed by James Wan, is the best Saw movie, with Saw X second and Saw II third. Saw (2004) earned about $104 million worldwide on a $1.2 million budget, and its single room setup has not been matched. The most successful at the box office was Saw III, with about $165 million worldwide.

Which is the scariest Saw film?

In my opinion, Saw (2004) is the scariest, because it keeps two chained men in one bathroom with a dead body and a 6:00 deadline, and lets dread do the work. Saw III is more punishing, with Troy tearing chains out of his body and Kerry in a rib harness, but I find it cruel rather than frightening.

What is the weakest Saw movie?

I rank Saw V as the weakest of the ten, because its two storylines, Hoffman's rise and the five strangers' tests, do not feel like one film. It still earned about $114 million worldwide on a $10.8 million budget, so many fans disagree with me. Spiral earned the least, about $41 million.

Which Saw has the highest rating?

Ratings depend on whose scores you trust, and I rank on my own judgment, which puts Saw (2004) first. On money, Saw III is highest at about $165 million worldwide, followed by Saw II at about $148 million and Saw IV at about $139 million.

What is the lowest rated Saw movie?

My lowest ranked film is Saw V. By box office, the lowest is Spiral: From the Book of Saw at about $41 million worldwide on a $20 million budget, and the lowest among the nine main films is Saw VI at about $68 million.

How are the Saw movies ranked by gore?

They cannot be ranked by gore using ratings, because all ten are rated R in the US and 18 in the UK. In Australia, Saw V, Saw 3D and Spiral are rated R 18+ and the other seven are MA 15+. In my view, Saw III, Saw VI and Saw X have the most direct trap sequences.